Reflection¶
I had a good time with the group. I could argue that it may have been too informal for my own liking, but I think I did achieve most learning outcomes. Also, I felt it was natural to continue the relaxed atmosphere set by the previous teacher.
Note that I did not prepare much. There was no time, nor was there any need. This session seems to get more of a habit to me. It would be nice if I could find a way to challenge myself more here.
- [ ] Try to find a way to challenge me
Course evaluation results¶
- Thanks for being so upbeat and friendly:)
- It is great to have to opportunity for some practice and to play around with the tool.
- Very active session, it was good to learn in pairs to figure stuff out. I almost had an issue with publishing, as the instruction code line included [ ] around the code but your demo helped solve this issue. Also first time for me to create a repository on GitHub, I now understand that better too. Thanks for the session!
I have updated the course material and remove the more cryptic text.
- I struggled to change the layout of both the mind map and flow chart to align it with my thoughts/ story.
This is my bad! I should have told more often that the correct layout is not a goal of Mermaid
Conclusion¶
It went reasonably well. Due to my informality and unpreparedness, I would rate my teaching a 7 out of 10.
KTH evaluation results¶
16. Were there any parts of the course that were excellent?¶
Here I keep all feedback relevant to mermaid. Which is none :-)
17. Do you have any recommendations as to how the course could be improved?¶
Here I keep all feedback relevant to mermaid:
- I found that the mermaid toolbox was not that useful and the time allocated to it was not needed.
I agree that this can (and should be) debated: not everyone will benefit from this.
- [ ] Discuss with Meike to keep/remove mermaid. I am fine with it either way.