Skip to content

Peer observations

I think peer observations are a useful learning experiences to get better at teaching.

My favorite peer observation model is the 'peer review model' [Gosling, 2002], that has the goal 'engagement in discussion about teaching; self and mutual reflection'. Here are the characteristics:

Characteristic Peer Review Model [Gosling, 2002]
Who does it & to whom? teachers observe each other
Purpose Analysis, discussion, wider experience of teaching methods
Outcome Non-judgemental, constructive feedback
Status of evidence peer shared perception
Relationship of observer to observed equality/mutuality
Confidentiality Between observer and the observed - shared within learning set
Inclusion all
Judgement Non-judgemental, constructive feedback
What is observed? Teaching performance, class, learning materials
Who benefits? Mutual between peers
Conditions for success Teaching is valued, discussed
Risks Complacency, conservatism, unfocused

My favorite way to do peer observation is based on the tips from [Siddiqui et al., 2007], with the most important practical one is to schedule a session before and after the observation to discuss, for a duration of 45 minutes each.

Tip Title, from [Siddiqui et al., 2007]
1 Choose the observer carefully.
2 Set aside time for the peer observation.
3 Clarify expectations.
4 Familiarise yourself with the course
5 Select the instrument wisely
6 Include students.
7 Be objective
8 Resist the urge to compare with your own teaching style
9 Do not intervene
10 Follow the general principles for feedback
11 Respect confidentiality.
12 Make it a learning experience

Peer observations overview

Here are my English peer observations

When Observee Observer Observation text
2023-08-24 Eli Me On paper only
2025-02-10 Me Jayant Yadev PDF

Peer observation minor literature review

The goal is to find out how to best do peer observation of teaching. I searched Google Scholar for 'peer observation of teaching' and go through the first 10 hits.

Then I rate the usefulness of a paper based on its title:

Reference Useful Title
[Bell et al., 2008] Not The benefits of peer observation of teaching for tutor development
[Siddiqui et al., 2007] Yes Twelve tips for peer observation of teaching
[Fletcher, 2018] Maybe Peer observation of teaching: A practical tool in higher education
[Gosling, 2002] Yes Models of peer observation of teaching
[Donnelly, 2015] Maybe Perceived impact of peer observation of teaching in higher education
[Sullivan et al., 2012] Maybe Peer observation of teaching as a faculty development tool
[Yiend et al., 2014] Maybe Peer observation of teaching: The interaction between peer review and developmental models of practice
[Kohut et al., 2007] Maybe Peer observation of teaching: Perceptions of the observer and the observed
[Carroll and O'Loughlin, 2014] Maybe Peer observation of teaching: enhancing academic engagement for new participants
[Bell and Cooper, 2013] Maybe Peer observation of teaching in university departments: A framework for implementation

Starting from the two most useful papers:

[Siddiqui et al., 2007] has these tips:

  • Tip 1: Choose the observer carefully. I think I do so.
  • Tip 2: Set aside time for the peer observation. That is, for each of the three stages (pre-observation, the observation itself and the post-observation) schedule 45 minutes at minimum
  • Tip 3: Clarify expectations.
    • My general expectation: to discuss teaching respectfully with the observed lesson as the subject (i.e. tip 12)
    • When observed, I expect the observer not to interfere with my teaching (i.e. tip 9)
    • When observing, I expect the teacher to have thought of how to deal with my presence (e.g. where do I sit, how to include the students (i.e. tip 6))
  • Tip 4: Familiarise yourself with the course
  • Tip 5: Select the instrument wisely
  • Tip 6: Include students.
  • Tip 7: Be objective
  • Tip 8: Resist the urge to compare with your own teaching style
  • Tip 9: Do not intervene
  • Tip 10: Follow the general principles for feedback
  • Tip 11: Respect confidentiality. Here I should be clear what I put online and what not:
    • When I am observed, I enjoy to upload it as-is
    • When I am observing, I leave it to the observee what to do with my notes
  • Tip 12: Make it a learning experience

[Gosling, 2002] states that there are three main observation models:

  • evaluation model
  • development model
  • peer review model

The most relevant here is the 'peer review model', as its purpose is 'engagement in discussion about teaching; self and mutual reflection'

Characteristic Evaluation Model Development Model Peer Review Model
Who does it & to whom? Senior staff observe other staff Educational developers observe practitioners; or expert teachers observe others in department teachers observe each other
Purpose Identify underperformance, confirm probation, appraisal, promotion, quality assurance, assessment Demonstrate competency/improve teaching competencies; assessment engagement in discussion about teaching; self and mutual reflection Analysis, discussion, wider experience of teaching methods
Outcome Report/judgement report/action plan; pass/fail PGCert Report/action plan; pass/fail Non-judgemental, constructive feedback
Status of evidence authority expert diagnosis peer shared perception
Relationship of observer to observed power expertise equality/mutuality
Confidentiality Between manager, observer and staff observed Between observer and the observed, examiner Between observer and the observed - shared within learning set
Inclusion Selected staff Selected/sample all
Judgement Pass/fail, score, quality assessment, worthy/unworthy How to improve; pass/fail Non-judgemental, constructive feedback
What is observed? Teaching performance Teaching performance, class, learning materials Teaching performance, class, learning materials
Who benefits? Institution The observed Mutual between peers
Conditions for success Embedded management processes Effective central unit Teaching is valued, discussed
Risks Alienation, lack of cooperation, opposition No shared ownership, lack of impact Complacency, conservatism, unfocused

I think this is good enough for now, with [Siddiqui et al., 2007] being a perfect starting point.

References

  • [Bell et al., 2008] Bell, Amani, and Rosina Mladenovic. "The benefits of peer observation of teaching for tutor development." Higher education 55.6 (2008): 735-752.
  • [Siddiqui et al., 2007] Siddiqui, Zarrin Seema, Diana Jonas-Dwyer, and Sandra E. Carr. "Twelve tips for peer observation of teaching." Medical teacher 29.4 (2007): 297-300.
  • [Fletcher, 2018] Fletcher, Jeffrey A. "Peer observation of teaching: A practical tool in higher education." The Journal of Faculty Development 32.1 (2018): 51-64.
  • [Gosling, 2002] Gosling, David. "Models of peer observation of teaching." Generic Centre: Learning and Teaching Support Network 8.10 (2002): 08.
  • [Donnelly, 2015] Donnelly, Roisin. "Perceived impact of peer observation of teaching in higher education." (2015): 117-129.
  • [Sullivan et al., 2012] Sullivan, Peter B., et al. "Peer observation of teaching as a faculty development tool." BMC medical education 12.1 (2012): 26.
  • [Yiend et al., 2014] Yiend, Jenny, Saranne Weller, and Ian Kinchin. "Peer observation of teaching: The interaction between peer review and developmental models of practice." Journal of Further and Higher Education 38.4 (2014): 465-484.
  • [Kohut et al., 2007] Kohut, Gary F., Charles Burnap, and Maria G. Yon. "Peer observation of teaching: Perceptions of the observer and the observed." College teaching 55.1 (2007): 19-25.
  • [Carroll and O'Loughlin, 2014] Carroll, Conor, and Deirdre O'Loughlin. "Peer observation of teaching: enhancing academic engagement for new participants." Innovations in education and teaching international 51.4 (2014): 446-456.
  • [Bell and Cooper, 2013] Bell, Maureen, and Paul Cooper. "Peer observation of teaching in university departments: A framework for implementation." International Journal for Academic Development 18.1 (2013): 60-73.